heartsandminds

explorations of a wanna-be difference-maker in nursing education and life in general

Is a fragile community better than no community?

Networked Organizational Structure by michael.heiss, on Flickr
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 Generic License  by  michael.heiss<a
Wow, what a week it’s been.  I won’t bore you with a day by day play by play, rather a 3 day sampling will suffice.   Where to begin…I’ll start with Thursday… a 3 hour lab for second year nursing students with the topic of mental health assessment.  My colleague and I collaboratively facilitate this lab and she was “leading” today.  I had my laptop out, sitting to the side, feeling restless and frustrated while witnessing a didactic “push” of information toward 12 students exhausted from their previous 2 1/2 days in clinical.  I’m surfing blogs, for heaven’s sake, of persons blogging on their experience with mental illness, convinced there’s got to be a better way to do this.  Soon enough we got to the role plays and practice assessments and the students become engaged and learning happens!
On Friday morning, the same 12 students return to health assessment 220 lab.  Today, they appear well rested and more focused.  The topic is a heavy one for the Friday lead-in to a long weekend; the emotional component of mental health assessment.  In this lab, we will identify “high-risk for suicide” groups, practice interviewing with the focus on emotional dimension, and proceed to a suicide risk assessment if deemed necessary.  After the requisite viewing of video modeling this interview, my colleague shares a glimpse of her personal battle with depression.  We look at the Theory of Chronic Sorrow as a framework for understanding and intervening with individuals or family members of individuals with chronic physical or mental health challenges.  I share my personal appreciation for this framework as it describes my experience as the parent of a child with insulin dependent diabetes and I “leak” a little.  The students are highly engaged and interacting on a deeper level than what we’ve seen before (this is their 4th lab together).  Two of them share their experiences with depression and suicidal ideation, what help(ed/s) and hinder(ed/s) in their management.  By the time we go to practice with role playing scenarios, the students are totally invested, each and every one.  The caring and learning in the room is almost tangible.  In a triad of students working behind a curtain, one student breaks down and shares a REAL monumental burden she’s been carrying for three years AND the 2 students working with her apply what they’ve been learning to assist her.. …. my colleague checks in and  facilitates an action plan so that students are not left to carry this.
I’m still feeling deeply moved when I consider what transpired in that room on Friday and  I am framing it in light of the characteristics of community, as described by Dr. Richard Schwier.  Trust promoted intimacy in this community of second year nursing students.  I expect the relationships built here will develop resilience to breech the boundaries of a lab that happens only 12 times in a Term 1.  Why? Because people desire to know one another and be known as much as they desire to learn the content they showed up to learn.
Which takes me to Wednesday, …and a stimulating skype interview with my personal teaching idol, Dr. Sandra Bassendowski at the U of S, Regina site,  who has been an early adopter of ICT in nursing education.  The purpose of this chat was to incorporate communication from the interview into a paper for my online leadership course.  I had prepared Dr. B. that I was particularly interested in her leadership in integration of ICT.  So I started the interview with a question, “Is it fair to assume that ICT is vital to the process of teaching and implementing evidence-based practice?”  Her answer: “(we are) evolving and moving, we have a ways to go, the valuing of tech is not there yet.”   I was first exposed to the pedagogy of “connectivity” in Sandra’s Teaching in Nursing course last year. Online community sprung up in that course.  We met f2f once a week, but we really connected on Ning, co-creating our curriculum for 30% of our grade.  The grumpiest adopters are still lamenting that we couldn’t leave the site up.  I know this because they are now part of my PLN.   5 of us MN students from S’toon coffee and wrestle with concepts, plan our papers, or help each other out with practical organizational tips as we are all FT nurses in ed. or management.  I echo what Shauna said about students who don’t speak up in class or clinical post-conference finding their voice online because I was one of those. I became animated on the web.  We absolutely knew more about each other from the online component than the f2f part as we shared photos and videos clips and passions became evident in the freedom of co-creation.
The line  between my two current courses – Nursing Leadership and eci831 – has  blurred  this week.  The learning in each is synergistic for the other.   Leadership requires continuous learning;  communication with experts within and without one’s field, and followers;  identification of values; reflection, and innovation.  These are all threads flowing through eci831.
As I’m contemplating my leadership development plan, I’m affirming the value of a PLN to self-actualize as a teacher and a leader.  As I’m considering my project for eci831,  I expect that whatever I create will bring innovation to my teaching AND strengthen me as a leader of students and colleagues.
A final thought for the week:  the image chosen to begin this week’s reflection symbolizes my feeling about where we are as eci831 participants this week.  Some of us have some fragile points of connection, but as yet, there’s nothing to keep a breath of wind from eternally separating us.
Thanks Alec for the simple instructions for attributing images in our blogs.
Advertisements

Single Post Navigation

One thought on “Is a fragile community better than no community?

  1. Thanks for this post, Judy. It really helps me to understand the relationship of this course to the rest of your working/learning.

    It’s interesting to hear about the issue of the 18-24 month publication cycle. I actually have one that is in a longer cycle – a chapter that I submitted in early 2008 is still waiting to be published. In fact, I have already published an update to the project, which cites the paper this paper that has been accepted but not yet published. The current publishing model is a farce, and one of the reasons I’m committed to open publishing. In fact, I’ve sworn an open access oath – I will only publish in open access journals, and will only review papers headed to the same.

    And awesome – looks like you have figured out the Flickr attribution. Well done!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: